REASONED SPIRITUALITY:
exploring spirituality, the meaning of life, the concept of
God.
| PART~1 | PART~2 | PART~3 | PART~4 | PART~5 | PART~6 | PART~7 | PART~8 | PART~9 | PART~10 | PART~11 | PART~12 | PART~13 | PART~14 | PART~15 | PART~16 | PART~17 | PART~18 | PART~19 | PART~20 | PART~21 |
PART~22 | PART~23 |
PART~24 | PART~25 |
PART~26 | PART~27
|
| HOME |
COMMENTS?
| GLOSSARY | GUESTBOOK | FAQ |
LINKS | NEW! |
UPDATES | GUEST~ARTICLES | SITEMAP |
MIND GAMES: EXERCISE FOR YOUR
BRAIN
Strange concepts to contemplate; just for the fun of
it.
How do you know that you are not the only entity that exists
in the universe?
All that you are aware of is simply your perception of it: what you
see, what you touch, everything that exists to you is experienced in
your consciousness. Could it be that nothing actually has a physical
existence, but only seems that way because you believe it to be so?
Perhaps your awareness is all that creates this view of the universe;
that it is structured in this form because it is the only way that
you can make sense of it. The universe may be strictly ethereal in
nature, and you must create forms that you can relate to. Your mind
creates other people, in order to simulate interaction, and allow for
diverse and interesting mental experiences (such as you do when you
dream). Good and bad events are mental illusions to create contrast:
to know what pleasure is, one must experience pain; to know the
satisfaction of a fine meal, one must experience hunger; to know the
sensation of a cool drink on a hot day, one must know thirst.
Your awareness may be the universe; only it exists, and all else is a
creation of it. Nothing is ever so bad, in your consciousness, that
it destroys you; no matter what has occurred in this illusion of a
physical world, you continue to exist and experience it all. The
unexpected is not as it seems; for if you didn't structure your world
to include constant surprises, you would quickly loose the will to
continue: you need constant change in order to experience, to be
thinking, and changing as well.
If this is not the case, then how do you prove otherwise?
There are thousands of beliefs about life after death: let's
add one more.
Remember the time when you slipped and hit your head; or were
hospitalized; or had that near-disaster in traffic; or went to bed
with a terrible headache? What if that was your moment of death?
Perhaps one of these events, that you remember as an insignificant
occurrence, was actually the end of your physical existence; which
your awareness (or "soul") refuses to accept. Maybe your subconscious
mind blocks out the memory of the true details about the event that
led to your demise, and constructs an illusion of a continuing life.
The afterlife may be something you never actually realize
consciously, because your subconscious creates an elaborate facade in
order to cling to existence. The imaginary world your awareness
exists in is complete and unquestionable; otherwise, it would fail.
You cannot have a life of perpetual good fortune: obviously, that is
unrealistic. Good and bad events must randomly occur, in order to
make life appear normal. You, and others, must gradually age: but
time is relative; and what seems a year to you, may be ten thousand
in the real world you left behind. The people that populate your
world are illusions: some are the people you knew when you died, and
you continue to create a believable storyline for them; others are
people you encountered, but do not clearly remember, that you insert
into your ethereal existence to continue to have new experiences:
which are simply past experiences rearranged to seem fresh.
Occasionally, your subconscious mind uses something that isn't buried
quite deep enough; and you have an uneasy feeling that you have met
the person before, or that this exact event occurred in your past;
but you quickly dismiss this as deja vu.
Thanks to Phillip Hoffman, of the U of C Philosophy
department, for teaching me this one.
This is a two part thought experiment, so don't dissect the logic;
just the concept.
You are walking along the railroad tracks when you hear a train
racing up behind you. Beside you is an unlocked rail switch, at a 'Y'
in the tracks. Ahead, you see five rail workers having lunch on the
tracks: all wearing headphones, and completely unaware of the train
bearing down upon them. On the other branch is one person sitting on
the rails; also unaware of the train. You only have a moment to
decide: do you throw the switch, and send the train toward the lone
individual, and cause his death; or do nothing, and allow the five
men to die?
You are the finest doctor in all the land, doing charitable work in
the wilderness. While you are doing a routine checkup on a man, five
people are brought to you who were critically injured.
Coincidentally, all five victims, and the man in for a checkup, share
the same blood type. Each of the victims is injured in a different
vital organ, and will die without a transplant. You are such a great
doctor, that it is virtually guaranteed that all the transplants
would be successful, and each person would make a complete recovery.
You only have a moment to decide: do you kill the healthy individual
and harvest his organs, so that the five men will survive; or do
nothing, and allow the victims to die?
Is there any difference between the two scenarios?






























Copyright
1998 B.W.Holmes - all rights reserved (unless noted otherwise).
Quotes from ancient literary works do not carry a copyright.